On September 12 2026, Kerala’s Chief Minister V D Satheesan opened a three‑day seminar on music, cinema and law in Kochi and called for urgent amendments to the state’s copyright framework. The event, co‑hosted by the Kerala Judicial Academy and the National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS), ran until September 13 and drew legal scholars, industry stakeholders and government officials.

Satheesan warned that piracy continues to sap the Malayalam film industry, which churns out roughly 150 movies a year with a combined investment of about ₹450 crore. According to estimates reported in The Hindu, the annual loss from video piracy stands at roughly ₹150 crore. He urged the state to tighten legal protection for creative works and to tackle the new challenges posed by artificial intelligence.

The chief minister highlighted that AI is increasingly used to generate music, images and videos. He noted the rise of deepfakes—synthetic media that can place public figures in fabricated scenarios—and the security threats they pose when shared on social media. Satheesan said the existing legal framework must evolve to keep pace with such technological developments.

The seminar’s agenda covered contemporary legal issues surrounding music, cinema, copyright, AI, digital platforms and creative rights. Supreme Court judge Justice V Mohan was the chief guest, while Higher Education Minister R Bindu attended. Kerala High Court Chief Justice Soumen Sen, speaking at the event, remarked that law, music and cinema are deeply intertwined with human behaviour and emotions. He added that music serves as a cultural expression that reflects society’s memories, protests, language and identity.

The call for reform comes against a backdrop of ongoing debates in India about copyright law. The Copyright Act of 1957, amended most recently in 2012, governs intellectual property rights in the country. While India is a party to international conventions such as the Berne Convention and TRIPS, it has yet to enact specific legislation addressing AI‑generated content and deepfakes. Researchers and legal scholars have warned that the lack of clear regulatory guidance creates a grey zone where synthetic media can be used to spread misinformation or infringe on personal rights.

Satheesan’s remarks also reflected the state’s broader cultural priorities. He emphasised that art and artists provide a means for people to cope with hardship and experience joy. Protecting creative works, he said, is essential for sustaining the cultural economy and ensuring that artists receive fair compensation.

The Kerala government’s push for legal updates follows a series of initiatives aimed at supporting the film and music industries. In 2024, the state launched a digital platform to help filmmakers register copyrights and monitor online infringement. The current seminar is part of a continuing effort to align state law with the rapid pace of technological change.

In summary, the chief minister’s appeal signals a recognition that piracy remains a significant economic threat to Kerala’s creative sectors and that emerging AI technologies introduce new legal challenges. The state’s next steps will likely involve drafting amendments to the Copyright Act, establishing clearer rules for AI‑generated content, and enhancing enforcement mechanisms against online piracy. The outcome of these discussions will shape how Kerala protects its cultural heritage and supports its creative economy in the digital age.