Alabama Lawmakers Push State-Level AI Safety Rules for Children and Teens
State Senator President Pro Tem Garlan Gudger (R‑Cullman) opened the discussion by stressing that Alabama must act independently of federal guidance. "In my personal opinion, I think that we have to do something at the state level to help regulate this," Gudger said. He added that federal guidelines are unlikely to change as quickly as state lawmakers can. "I think it’s going to have to be up to the states because it’s very evident that the federal guidelines are not going to change as fast as the states can change," he explained. Gudger emphasized that state action is essential to hold companies accountable if their software negatively impacts Alabama’s most vulnerable population.
The meeting also featured Dr. Nancy Brinson, an assistant professor of advertising and public relations at the University of Alabama. Brinson highlighted the unique persuasive power of AI compared to traditional search engines. "We talk about persuasive, it’s having a conversation with you, it’s not just saying something and leaving it alone, it’s trying to continue to convince you to do something," she said. She noted that AI systems can use predictive analytics to pull large amounts of data from a child’s interactions with smartphones, smart home devices, and smart watches. "This is the power of predictive analytics, and it just pulls so much data about you based on your interactions and your behaviors that it can pretty much predict what your behaviors are going to be," Brinson added.
The discussion underscored that children are already immersed in technology and that AI can provide guidance or influence decisions at a young age. State lawmakers were reminded that the goal of future legislation is to regulate AI effectively while ensuring provisions could withstand court scrutiny. The commission reviewed what other states have enacted to regulate AI for minors, noting that many have introduced age‑verification requirements or content‑filtering rules.
A key point of the meeting was the status of a bill that would require AI chatbot developers to implement reasonable age‑verification systems. According to the report, the bill failed to advance to a committee hearing during the current legislative session. The failure was noted by attendees as a setback for those seeking immediate regulatory action.
In closing, the commission reiterated that Alabama’s approach to AI safety for children and teens will likely involve a combination of state‑level legislation, industry self‑regulation, and enforcement mechanisms. While federal policy remains slow to respond, state lawmakers are urged to move quickly to protect minors from persuasive AI systems that can shape behavior through predictive analytics.
The next steps for Alabama lawmakers include drafting new bills that address age verification, content moderation, and accountability for AI developers. The commission will continue to monitor developments in other states and federal initiatives to ensure that Alabama’s regulations are robust and enforceable.