Blab AI
Gareth Emery Launches Human-Made Music Label Amid AI-Music Concerns
In a bold move that reverberated through the club scene, British trance maestro Gareth Emery publicly denounced the rise of AI‑generated music and unveiled a new record imprint dedicated to human‑made tracks.
Emery’s warning began when he discovered that certain AI music models were being trained directly on his own catalog. In a recent social‑media post, he cautioned that the industry was steering toward a future dominated by “fake artists, fake voices, stolen training data, and a streaming economy where the key players seem to be happy to bury human music under infinite synthetic slop.” He added that if this trend continues, it is unclear who ultimately benefits.
While acknowledging that AI can be a useful tool, Emery emphasized the irreplaceable role of human emotion in electronic music. He wrote that “there is a human energy that flows through human‑made work. Even if we can’t always prove it or explain it, we feel it.” He argued that imperfections in a track are not flaws but proof that a person created it, and he expressed a desire to preserve that authenticity.
To put his stance into action, Emery announced the launch of Emotional Intelligence Records, a new LSR/CITY record‑label project. The imprint is described as “a dedicated sanctuary for human creators” and will curate a small corner of the internet where all releases are AI‑free, including both music and artwork.
The first release under the new imprint is a single titled “Burn It Down.” Emery has opened a pre‑save campaign for the track and noted that industry support is expected to be minimal. He concluded the announcement with a rallying cry to fans: “The first record, LSR/CITY ‘Burn It Down’ can be pre‑saved now. And as I can guarantee this will receive negative zero industry support, every pre‑save counts!”
Emery’s move comes amid a broader debate over AI‑generated music. In recent years, several high‑profile cases have highlighted the legal and ethical challenges of training models on copyrighted works without permission. The U.S. Copyright Office released guidance in 2023 on AI‑generated content, and in 2026 new EU AI regulations and court rulings tightened the rules around using artists’ voices and melodies in synthetic music.
Industry observers note that while AI can accelerate composition and production, it also raises questions about authorship, royalties, and the value of human creativity. Emery’s label is positioned as a counter‑measure, offering a platform where artists can release music that is guaranteed to be free from AI influence.
The initiative has attracted attention from both fans of trance and advocates of music‑industry reform. Whether the label can sustain a viable business model in a market that increasingly favors algorithmically generated content remains to be seen. Nonetheless, Emery’s public stance and the launch of Emotional Intelligence Records signal a growing segment of artists who are actively resisting the encroachment of AI into the creative process.
As the debate over AI in music continues, the industry will likely see further developments in regulation, technology, and artist‑led initiatives. Emery’s imprint may serve as a test case for how human‑made music can coexist with AI‑generated alternatives, and it will be closely watched by both the electronic‑music community and the broader entertainment sector.
Emery’s warning began when he discovered that certain AI music models were being trained directly on his own catalog. In a recent social‑media post, he cautioned that the industry was steering toward a future dominated by “fake artists, fake voices, stolen training data, and a streaming economy where the key players seem to be happy to bury human music under infinite synthetic slop.” He added that if this trend continues, it is unclear who ultimately benefits.
While acknowledging that AI can be a useful tool, Emery emphasized the irreplaceable role of human emotion in electronic music. He wrote that “there is a human energy that flows through human‑made work. Even if we can’t always prove it or explain it, we feel it.” He argued that imperfections in a track are not flaws but proof that a person created it, and he expressed a desire to preserve that authenticity.
To put his stance into action, Emery announced the launch of Emotional Intelligence Records, a new LSR/CITY record‑label project. The imprint is described as “a dedicated sanctuary for human creators” and will curate a small corner of the internet where all releases are AI‑free, including both music and artwork.
The first release under the new imprint is a single titled “Burn It Down.” Emery has opened a pre‑save campaign for the track and noted that industry support is expected to be minimal. He concluded the announcement with a rallying cry to fans: “The first record, LSR/CITY ‘Burn It Down’ can be pre‑saved now. And as I can guarantee this will receive negative zero industry support, every pre‑save counts!”
Emery’s move comes amid a broader debate over AI‑generated music. In recent years, several high‑profile cases have highlighted the legal and ethical challenges of training models on copyrighted works without permission. The U.S. Copyright Office released guidance in 2023 on AI‑generated content, and in 2026 new EU AI regulations and court rulings tightened the rules around using artists’ voices and melodies in synthetic music.
Industry observers note that while AI can accelerate composition and production, it also raises questions about authorship, royalties, and the value of human creativity. Emery’s label is positioned as a counter‑measure, offering a platform where artists can release music that is guaranteed to be free from AI influence.
The initiative has attracted attention from both fans of trance and advocates of music‑industry reform. Whether the label can sustain a viable business model in a market that increasingly favors algorithmically generated content remains to be seen. Nonetheless, Emery’s public stance and the launch of Emotional Intelligence Records signal a growing segment of artists who are actively resisting the encroachment of AI into the creative process.
As the debate over AI in music continues, the industry will likely see further developments in regulation, technology, and artist‑led initiatives. Emery’s imprint may serve as a test case for how human‑made music can coexist with AI‑generated alternatives, and it will be closely watched by both the electronic‑music community and the broader entertainment sector.
